<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Airplane Geeks Podcast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.airplanegeeks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com</link>
	<description>Podcasting Aviation Greatness Since 2008.  The Airplane Geeks talk about the latest in the airline industry, general aviation, and military aviation.  If it flies, we\'re talking about it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:22:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 202 &#8211; Become a Pilot Day 2012 by Aviation Queen</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2012/06/19/episode-202-become-a-pilot-day-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-13848</link>
		<dc:creator>Aviation Queen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=1836#comment-13848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] June, I got to hang out with the Airplane Geeks for  Become a Pilot Day at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum&#8216;s Steven F. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June, I got to hang out with the Airplane Geeks for  Become a Pilot Day at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum&#8216;s Steven F. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 220 &#8211; Dan Hampton, Viper Pilot by DanielHamptonIII</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2012/10/24/episode-220-dan-hampton-viper-pilot/comment-page-1/#comment-13792</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielHamptonIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2075#comment-13792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Daniel renember me your son?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Daniel renember me your son?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 246 &#8211; Mary Kirby Knows the Airline Passenger Experience by Haitham</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/05/01/episode-246-mary-kirby-knows-the-airline-passenger-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-13780</link>
		<dc:creator>Haitham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 23:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2331#comment-13780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s anaconda airlines? Seems like an inside story I haven&#039;t heard of before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s anaconda airlines? Seems like an inside story I haven&#8217;t heard of before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 245 &#8211; Time and Navigation at the Smithsonian by Jamie Dodson</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/24/episode-245-time-and-navigation-at-the-smithsonian/comment-page-1/#comment-13755</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Dodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2322#comment-13755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Episode 245 – Time and Navigation at the Smithsonian 
The discussion about the effects of sequester truly peaked my interest. While David had good points, Rob has the truth of it. The public won’t cry to stop or mod until they feel the love – or pain - of sequester. So few are involved with Defense and they are geographically concentrated away from most large urban areas. As we saw after the show was recorded, congress quickly found money when the Air Traffic Control system slowed due to sequester mandated furloughs. That is an unlikely with Defense because John Q and Jane D Public won’t feel effects so personally.
David’s NASM navigation exhibit was spectacular. While I addressed the difficulties of early navigation in my Golden Age of Aviation novels, your interviews brought the challenges to life. Well done! Plus your guest spoke about the early flying boats and their navigational efforts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Episode 245 – Time and Navigation at the Smithsonian<br />
The discussion about the effects of sequester truly peaked my interest. While David had good points, Rob has the truth of it. The public won’t cry to stop or mod until they feel the love – or pain &#8211; of sequester. So few are involved with Defense and they are geographically concentrated away from most large urban areas. As we saw after the show was recorded, congress quickly found money when the Air Traffic Control system slowed due to sequester mandated furloughs. That is an unlikely with Defense because John Q and Jane D Public won’t feel effects so personally.<br />
David’s NASM navigation exhibit was spectacular. While I addressed the difficulties of early navigation in my Golden Age of Aviation novels, your interviews brought the challenges to life. Well done! Plus your guest spoke about the early flying boats and their navigational efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 245 &#8211; Time and Navigation at the Smithsonian by Max Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/24/episode-245-time-and-navigation-at-the-smithsonian/comment-page-1/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2322#comment-13744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recordings are audio only. Sorry that wasn&#039;t clear. I edited the post to indicate they are audio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recordings are audio only. Sorry that wasn&#8217;t clear. I edited the post to indicate they are audio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 245 &#8211; Time and Navigation at the Smithsonian by curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/24/episode-245-time-and-navigation-at-the-smithsonian/comment-page-1/#comment-13728</link>
		<dc:creator>curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2322#comment-13728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The videos for time and navigation have sound but not video.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The videos for time and navigation have sound but not video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 244 &#8211; Capt. Jeff and the Sock Puppet by Max Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/17/episode-244-capt-jeff-and-the-sock-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-13718</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2311#comment-13718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sam: In fact, Boeing&#039;s fix for the battery issues includes a &quot;containment&quot; strategy. The battery box is redesigned to withstand and contain higher temperatures, it vents fumes outside the aircraft, and the system is designed to starve any battery fire of oxygen. There are other changes, including more insulation between the individual battery cells. Thermal runaway in these Lithium Ion batteries is still not fully understood, but Boeing has devised a way to mitigate the impact should that occur. And now we see that the FAA agrees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam: In fact, Boeing&#8217;s fix for the battery issues includes a &#8220;containment&#8221; strategy. The battery box is redesigned to withstand and contain higher temperatures, it vents fumes outside the aircraft, and the system is designed to starve any battery fire of oxygen. There are other changes, including more insulation between the individual battery cells. Thermal runaway in these Lithium Ion batteries is still not fully understood, but Boeing has devised a way to mitigate the impact should that occur. And now we see that the FAA agrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 244 &#8211; Capt. Jeff and the Sock Puppet by Sam B.</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/17/episode-244-capt-jeff-and-the-sock-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-13717</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2311#comment-13717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Geeks, 

Great show as always!  Just wondering why you guys keep hammering so hard on the 787 battery fix.  There are two or more engines on both jetliners that have fire in them at all times (hopefully) but it is contained in such a way that most of the time it is not a hazard.  There are also huge fuel tanks and there has been problems with those as well.  If boeing can come up with a way to contain a failure of a battery safely, I think the lithium-ion batteries can work very well.

P.S. missed David on this episode.

Keep up the great work]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Geeks, </p>
<p>Great show as always!  Just wondering why you guys keep hammering so hard on the 787 battery fix.  There are two or more engines on both jetliners that have fire in them at all times (hopefully) but it is contained in such a way that most of the time it is not a hazard.  There are also huge fuel tanks and there has been problems with those as well.  If boeing can come up with a way to contain a failure of a battery safely, I think the lithium-ion batteries can work very well.</p>
<p>P.S. missed David on this episode.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 244 &#8211; Capt. Jeff and the Sock Puppet by CW169: Big, Bald, and Voracious - SQPN: Catholic Weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/17/episode-244-capt-jeff-and-the-sock-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-13714</link>
		<dc:creator>CW169: Big, Bald, and Voracious - SQPN: Catholic Weekend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2311#comment-13714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Capt. Jeff on Airplane Geeks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Capt. Jeff on Airplane Geeks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 244 &#8211; Capt. Jeff and the Sock Puppet by APG 065 &#8211; Hacked &#8211; Not &#187; AIRLINE PILOT GUY</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/17/episode-244-capt-jeff-and-the-sock-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-13713</link>
		<dc:creator>APG 065 &#8211; Hacked &#8211; Not &#187; AIRLINE PILOT GUY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2311#comment-13713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Airplane Geeks Podcast, Episode 244 Bali &#8211; Approach and landing to Runway 27 300 taxis combine headlights to illuminate airstrip [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Airplane Geeks Podcast, Episode 244 Bali &#8211; Approach and landing to Runway 27 300 taxis combine headlights to illuminate airstrip [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 244 &#8211; Capt. Jeff and the Sock Puppet by Max Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/17/episode-244-capt-jeff-and-the-sock-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-13708</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2311#comment-13708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Jamie. We really enjoyed talking with Jeff. We went a little long but the conversation was too good to cut it off or shorten it in the edit.

On data encryption: It just amazes me that with all that&#039;s happened, some companies/governments just don&#039;t get it. If you put data out there in the clear, somebody somewhere sometime is going to use that towards their ends, not yours. In aviation, the stakes are just too high. Data must be encrypted and authenticated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jamie. We really enjoyed talking with Jeff. We went a little long but the conversation was too good to cut it off or shorten it in the edit.</p>
<p>On data encryption: It just amazes me that with all that&#8217;s happened, some companies/governments just don&#8217;t get it. If you put data out there in the clear, somebody somewhere sometime is going to use that towards their ends, not yours. In aviation, the stakes are just too high. Data must be encrypted and authenticated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 244 &#8211; Capt. Jeff and the Sock Puppet by Jamie Dodson</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/17/episode-244-capt-jeff-and-the-sock-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-13694</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Dodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2311#comment-13694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geeks!  Great show - as always. Captain Jeff was a wonderful guest and added a great deal to your content.  Anyone who loves flying boats is my type of pilot. The name of the flying boat airline was Avalon that flew from Long Beach to Catalina Island. Max, you are so spot on with encryption and data links - be it up or down. All data is exploitable - more so with unencrypted links.  That also goes for your wireless data connections at home. Anyone that has been around the intelligence community will confirm that you have an very valid position.

Keep it up Geeks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeks!  Great show &#8211; as always. Captain Jeff was a wonderful guest and added a great deal to your content.  Anyone who loves flying boats is my type of pilot. The name of the flying boat airline was Avalon that flew from Long Beach to Catalina Island. Max, you are so spot on with encryption and data links &#8211; be it up or down. All data is exploitable &#8211; more so with unencrypted links.  That also goes for your wireless data connections at home. Anyone that has been around the intelligence community will confirm that you have an very valid position.</p>
<p>Keep it up Geeks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 232 &#8211; The Airline Reporter Returns by danbury limo</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/01/23/episode-232-the-airline-reporter-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-13691</link>
		<dc:creator>danbury limo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2192#comment-13691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know I always thought the airlines BS&#039;d you about turning your devices off specially a cell phone during take off or landing, yet I just saw a report on (slashdot maybe??) that showed some hacker being capable of taking controls of an airplane via his modified cell phone.  i was skeptical at first, but when more news outlets reported on this, I really did become somewhat convinced that a bad app (has to be linked to wifi somehow) could actually cause some disuption to an updated aircraft.   I really was the last person to turn off my devices (but not the phone as i always listened to instructions on that), but moving forward, if i have any doubt in mind that I&#039;m going to jeoperdize the lives of even a pet in a carriage let alone children, women and such, I&#039;m definitely turning my electronics off the minute i hear an announcement.  what do you guys think???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I always thought the airlines BS&#8217;d you about turning your devices off specially a cell phone during take off or landing, yet I just saw a report on (slashdot maybe??) that showed some hacker being capable of taking controls of an airplane via his modified cell phone.  i was skeptical at first, but when more news outlets reported on this, I really did become somewhat convinced that a bad app (has to be linked to wifi somehow) could actually cause some disuption to an updated aircraft.   I really was the last person to turn off my devices (but not the phone as i always listened to instructions on that), but moving forward, if i have any doubt in mind that I&#8217;m going to jeoperdize the lives of even a pet in a carriage let alone children, women and such, I&#8217;m definitely turning my electronics off the minute i hear an announcement.  what do you guys think???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 243 &#8211; Talking with Igor Sikorsky III by Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/10/episode-243-talking-with-igor-sikorsky-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-13655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2301#comment-13655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geeks!

Another fantastic podcast, guys. 

Great hear Igor Sikorsky&#039;s voice again. He’s an amazing guest and great pilot.  My wife and I had a wonderful time at Bradford Camps last summer during the Igor Sikorsky Weekend. As you know I have an affinity for seaplanes – some would say it’s an addition. Last summer, Igor gave me my first seaplane flight.  He flew my wife and me to a beautiful secluded lake that you either had to either hike in or fly-in. His C-172 goes form mush to the step nicely.  If your listeners get a chance, I recommend a week –or weekend at Bradford Camps.

David: Go for broke on the A-4. I&#039;d like your take on the Falkland Islands.

Steve and Grant, Oz Desk:  Great PCDU. It was great to hear Doug Worrell! His take on the QANTA got around flap was right on. ABC was looking for ratings not the real story. Give me the go around every time. I never want the PIC/Captain to rush anything. I have had the LEO (Low Earth Orbit) game for about a month. It’s a fun app for iPad, iPhone or Android thing.  Did I hear Doug correctly?  It’s a physics trainer? 

I enjoyed Carl’s story about his Tu-134A flight to Dubrovnik.  I flew into Dubrovnik also but in 1996 and in a C-130 flown the Greek Air Force. It was one of the most terrifying flights I have ever survived. 

Keep the bloopers coming!
Jamie]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeks!</p>
<p>Another fantastic podcast, guys. </p>
<p>Great hear Igor Sikorsky&#8217;s voice again. He’s an amazing guest and great pilot.  My wife and I had a wonderful time at Bradford Camps last summer during the Igor Sikorsky Weekend. As you know I have an affinity for seaplanes – some would say it’s an addition. Last summer, Igor gave me my first seaplane flight.  He flew my wife and me to a beautiful secluded lake that you either had to either hike in or fly-in. His C-172 goes form mush to the step nicely.  If your listeners get a chance, I recommend a week –or weekend at Bradford Camps.</p>
<p>David: Go for broke on the A-4. I&#8217;d like your take on the Falkland Islands.</p>
<p>Steve and Grant, Oz Desk:  Great PCDU. It was great to hear Doug Worrell! His take on the QANTA got around flap was right on. ABC was looking for ratings not the real story. Give me the go around every time. I never want the PIC/Captain to rush anything. I have had the LEO (Low Earth Orbit) game for about a month. It’s a fun app for iPad, iPhone or Android thing.  Did I hear Doug correctly?  It’s a physics trainer? </p>
<p>I enjoyed Carl’s story about his Tu-134A flight to Dubrovnik.  I flew into Dubrovnik also but in 1996 and in a C-130 flown the Greek Air Force. It was one of the most terrifying flights I have ever survived. </p>
<p>Keep the bloopers coming!<br />
Jamie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 241 &#8211; Jon Ostrower by Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/02/episode-241-jon-ostrower/comment-page-1/#comment-13601</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 19:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2286#comment-13601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geeks

Great show and David’s Skyhawk (not C-172) piece was fantastic but ...  I need show notes. I have CRS (Can&#039;t Remember Stuff).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeks</p>
<p>Great show and David’s Skyhawk (not C-172) piece was fantastic but &#8230;  I need show notes. I have CRS (Can&#8217;t Remember Stuff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 241 &#8211; Jon Ostrower by Max Flight</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/04/02/episode-241-jon-ostrower/comment-page-1/#comment-13600</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Flight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2286#comment-13600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When AirplaneGeeks.com was recently moved to a new server, the counter for this episode was reset. There&#039;s no way to undo that so the download counter counter you see for this episode is understated by around 5000 downloads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When AirplaneGeeks.com was recently moved to a new server, the counter for this episode was reset. There&#8217;s no way to undo that so the download counter counter you see for this episode is understated by around 5000 downloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 240 &#8211; Jack Pelton by Terry D Welander</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/03/20/episode-240-jack-pelton/comment-page-1/#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry D Welander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2275#comment-13525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The assumption 100LL will go away is highly erroneous and highly ignorant.  The 1200 volcanoes on the planet place more lead and other toxins in the atmosphere in a year than all of the entire 100LL fleet in 100 years.  Help stop the stupidity on 100LL.  100LL is not a problem, has never been a problem, and will never be problem compared to all of nature&#039;s toxins routinely challenging our and the planet&#039;s health.  The blind have been leading the blind so far on 100LL; or highly unacceptable and highly unlawful fraud to date on 100LL.

Remanufacturing aircraft within the confines of the existing FARs by small shops is much smarter than a dedicated company doing remanufacture making changes which will generate politically motivated airworthiness directives (ADs).  

Or refurbishing aircraft to better than new condition strictly following the original type certificates will result in a higher quality product at a lower price.  No need to take my word for this.  Talk to any A&amp;P/AI small shop refurbishing older aircraft and compare quality and pricing.  There is no doubt in my mind the refurbished aircraft will be better than anything new; based on my experience more than anything else. 

The commenters notions on Air France 447 are one of the worst distractions seen in my lifetime.  If a doppler style radar had been in place as back up giving a ground speed indication when all three pitot tubes failed due to icing, the accident would not have happened.  This root cause is so incredibly obvious to any trained person who has examined the data, there is almost no room for discussion.  If anyone, i repeat anyone has what they think is an alternative answer, please, please, please supply it where everyone can read it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The assumption 100LL will go away is highly erroneous and highly ignorant.  The 1200 volcanoes on the planet place more lead and other toxins in the atmosphere in a year than all of the entire 100LL fleet in 100 years.  Help stop the stupidity on 100LL.  100LL is not a problem, has never been a problem, and will never be problem compared to all of nature&#8217;s toxins routinely challenging our and the planet&#8217;s health.  The blind have been leading the blind so far on 100LL; or highly unacceptable and highly unlawful fraud to date on 100LL.</p>
<p>Remanufacturing aircraft within the confines of the existing FARs by small shops is much smarter than a dedicated company doing remanufacture making changes which will generate politically motivated airworthiness directives (ADs).  </p>
<p>Or refurbishing aircraft to better than new condition strictly following the original type certificates will result in a higher quality product at a lower price.  No need to take my word for this.  Talk to any A&amp;P/AI small shop refurbishing older aircraft and compare quality and pricing.  There is no doubt in my mind the refurbished aircraft will be better than anything new; based on my experience more than anything else. </p>
<p>The commenters notions on Air France 447 are one of the worst distractions seen in my lifetime.  If a doppler style radar had been in place as back up giving a ground speed indication when all three pitot tubes failed due to icing, the accident would not have happened.  This root cause is so incredibly obvious to any trained person who has examined the data, there is almost no room for discussion.  If anyone, i repeat anyone has what they think is an alternative answer, please, please, please supply it where everyone can read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 240 &#8211; Jack Pelton by Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/03/20/episode-240-jack-pelton/comment-page-1/#comment-13500</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2275#comment-13500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AF447 Comment: Rob was spot on about the effects of sleep deprivation and skills. However, another rumor that is much more of a French stereo type has emerged. 

In the final chaotic moments before Air France flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009, it took the captain of the aircraft, who was on a scheduled break, more than a minute to return to the cockpit, despite his two co-pilots&#039; frantic calls for help, black box recordings showed.

BTW: Ron IS A.R.R.P. Eligible!

Although it was never revealed what delayed Capt. Marc Dubois, two independent sources told ABC News that the 58-year-old veteran Air France pilot was traveling socially with an off-duty Air France flight attendant named Veronique Gaignard.

Jean-Paul Troadec, the director of BEA, the French authority conducting the investigation into the Flight 447 crash, told ABC News that Gaignard was not part of their investigation because the agency was &quot;not interested&quot; in the &quot;private life of the pilot.&quot; Troadec added that he did not think Dubois&#039;s alleged relations with Gaignard aboard the plane would have played a role in the accident.

Air France 447 was on an overnight trip from Rio de Janiero to Paris on May 31, 2009 when it vanished. The plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in the early morning hours of June 1, 2009.

http://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/af-447-ca-with-woman-when-flight-in-trouble.144945/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AF447 Comment: Rob was spot on about the effects of sleep deprivation and skills. However, another rumor that is much more of a French stereo type has emerged. </p>
<p>In the final chaotic moments before Air France flight 447 crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009, it took the captain of the aircraft, who was on a scheduled break, more than a minute to return to the cockpit, despite his two co-pilots&#8217; frantic calls for help, black box recordings showed.</p>
<p>BTW: Ron IS A.R.R.P. Eligible!</p>
<p>Although it was never revealed what delayed Capt. Marc Dubois, two independent sources told ABC News that the 58-year-old veteran Air France pilot was traveling socially with an off-duty Air France flight attendant named Veronique Gaignard.</p>
<p>Jean-Paul Troadec, the director of BEA, the French authority conducting the investigation into the Flight 447 crash, told ABC News that Gaignard was not part of their investigation because the agency was &#8220;not interested&#8221; in the &#8220;private life of the pilot.&#8221; Troadec added that he did not think Dubois&#8217;s alleged relations with Gaignard aboard the plane would have played a role in the accident.</p>
<p>Air France 447 was on an overnight trip from Rio de Janiero to Paris on May 31, 2009 when it vanished. The plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in the early morning hours of June 1, 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/af-447-ca-with-woman-when-flight-in-trouble.144945/" rel="nofollow">http://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/af-447-ca-with-woman-when-flight-in-trouble.144945/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 239 &#8211; Bob Poole on Air Traffic Control by Dane Boicos</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/03/13/episode-239-bob-poole-on-air-traffic-control/comment-page-1/#comment-13493</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane Boicos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2267#comment-13493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great episode. Always enjoy these podcasts :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great episode. Always enjoy these podcasts <img src='http://www.airplanegeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Episode 239 &#8211; Bob Poole on Air Traffic Control by Lori@Party Bus CT</title>
		<link>http://www.airplanegeeks.com/2013/03/13/episode-239-bob-poole-on-air-traffic-control/comment-page-1/#comment-13457</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori@Party Bus CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airplanegeeks.com/?p=2267#comment-13457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haha @Jamie I totally agree. I LOVED the first Airplane Experience segments myself and I do miss David too. @Airplane Geeks I watch and follow http://reason.com/reasontv

Great post Geeks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha @Jamie I totally agree. I LOVED the first Airplane Experience segments myself and I do miss David too. @Airplane Geeks I watch and follow <a href="http://reason.com/reasontv" rel="nofollow">http://reason.com/reasontv</a></p>
<p>Great post Geeks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
